Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi,
> 
>       I think if the untrimmed tree is under 100k compressed, then
>  we can get away with just having the untrimmed tree, don't you?

The untrimmed one is 74 K for binary-i386 (including binary-all).

>       manoj
>  wondering whether to do this for a complete hamm mirror

May the SOurce be with you.
                        Mrvn


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to