On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Lalo Martins wrote: > > Which made me wonder. Now that libapt is going to have its own > package, what will be in the "apt" package? apt-get? so > shouldn't the package be renamed "apt-get"? the fact that the > package name is "apt" gives the wrong idea that it contains a > full working replacement for dselect.
No, we decided to keep apt-get together with the library to make things
simpler for the users - for now. There are only libapt-pkg-{doc,dev}
packages.
Jason
