On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > Jason Gunthorpe writes: > > Subject: It is not. > > Please elaborate. Just saying "It is not" does not give much info, IMHO.
Bug 32888 deals with the screwed up nature of the base package and is not in any way related to APT or the text you gave. Please do not go around randomly re-assigning bugs without any justification, you should have filed a new bug that APT should default to No when it gives that particular warning. Jason
