On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Mitch Blevins wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Mitch Blevins wrote: > > > > > > We need to make the APT package provide the virtual package > > > > libapt-pkg2.1 > > > > and then have gnome-apt depend on that instead. Please do that if you > > > > are > > > > going to do anything.. > > > > > > I have deliberately avoided touching anything in the apt cvs tree. Does > > > this mean that I have permission to change the control files for apt in > > > cvs? (Don't wanna piss anybody off) > > > > Sure go crazy, but if you make an error we get to tar and feather you :> > > Just keep the changelog uptodate and be sure the provides: is in sync.. > > We need more than the Provides: to be in sync. > I found that the symlink in libapt-pkg-dev was still pointing to > libapt-pkg.2.0 even though we are now at 2.2.
Oh this all sounds very nice! Go ahead Jason
