In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wr ote: >Uh um.. Either you are not running this on an intel machine or strace is >-royally- messed up, these traces make very little sense, consider:
it's a sparc. >fork() = 24292 >wait4(24292, 0xeffff434, 0, NULL) = -1 ECHILD (No child processes) > >Wtf? There are other bizzar screw ups too. I dunno... do you think we need to file a bug against strace? I'm using rev. 3.99-1. >Anyhow - examining the trace I belive that there is something wrong with >the way it has ID'd the CD. Can you send me over a copy of >/var/state/apt/cdroms.list - I have a theory.. Ok, included. >Also, can you grab a copy of the source and edit methods/cdrom.cc arounds >line 125 put this: >[...] >and run apt with -qq and see what sorts of md5sums it prints. Ok, I'll try that later. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
CD::22953c6b44c99bb82c6b370c24e908b4 "Debian GNU_Linux slink (2.1) 2_5 main binary-sparc section 2, contrib and non-US SAM19990224"; CD::22953c6b44c99bb82c6b370c24e908b4::Label "Debian GNU/Linux slink (2.1) 2/5 main binary-sparc section 2, contrib and non-US SAM19990224"; CD::ad6d2b374261dff77eb7cbfd410269d7 "Debian GNU_Linux slink (2.1) 1_5 main binary-sparc section 1 SAM19990224"; CD::ad6d2b374261dff77eb7cbfd410269d7::Label "Debian GNU/Linux slink (2.1) 1/5 main binary-sparc section 1 SAM19990224"; CD::3eb4fd9ea01f329ce408558ee2ed7d24 "Debian GNU_Linux slink (2.1) 1_5 main binary-sparc section 1 SAM19990224"; CD::3eb4fd9ea01f329ce408558ee2ed7d24::Label "Debian GNU/Linux slink (2.1) 1/5 main binary-sparc section 1 SAM19990224";
