Your message dated Tue, 22 Jun 1999 19:47:11 -0600 (MDT) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#39999: Apt wishlist has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Ian Jackson (administrator, Debian bugs database) Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 1999 01:09:57 +0000 Received: (qmail 15393 invoked from network); 23 Jun 1999 01:09:57 -0000 Received: from vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au (HELO ALPHA1.CC.MONASH.EDU.AU) (130.194.1.1) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 23 Jun 1999 01:09:57 -0000 Received: from box.halls.monash.edu.au ([130.194.198.101]) by vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au (PMDF V5.2-31 #29714) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:09:52 +1000 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by box.halls.monash.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id LAA01754 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:03:37 +1000 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:03:37 +1000 From: Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Apt wishlist To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Package: apt Version: 0.3.6 More of a wish than a bug, it should be possible to inhibit the download/upgrade of individual packages. For example, I have vim 5.0-0.2 from Hamm installed. When I run 'apt-get upgrade', it pulls the unstable packages from my local mirror, including a newer package of vim. Unfortunately, at the time of writing, the vim package is missing alot of functionality. I would like to have a 'Dont-upgrade' section or something, where I can place this an any other packages I don't want upgraded.
