Your message dated Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:38:58 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 1999 23:03:09 +0000
Received: (qmail 14301 invoked from network); 13 Dec 1999 23:03:08 -0000
Received: from janeway.cistron.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 13 Dec 1999 23:03:08 -0000
Received: from lightning.mors.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.64.66.141])
        by janeway.cistron.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id AAA06799
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 1999 00:03:05 +0100
Received: from tornado.mors.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.50])
        by lightning.mors.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) with ESMTP id 
XAA16168;
        Mon, 13 Dec 1999 23:58:40 +0100
Received: by tornado.mors.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id BBBAE49038; Mon, 13 Dec 1999 23:58:39 +0100 (CET)
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: examples are missing
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 23:58:39 +0100 (CET)

Package: apt
Version: 0.3.15
Severity: normal

>From the manpage:

EXAMPLES
       /usr/doc/apt/examples/apt.conf contains a sample  configuĀ­
       ration  file  showing  the default values for all possible
       options.

In reality:
[lightning;/]-45> ls -ld /usr/doc/apt/examples/apt.conf
ls: /usr/doc/apt/examples/apt.conf: No such file or directory

It seems apt is strangely split over /usr/share/doc and /usr/doc
(do I detect debhelper here?)

Wichert.

-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux tornado 2.2.14pre11 #1 Sun Dec 5 03:09:46 CET 1999 i686 
unknown

Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6           2.1.2-10       GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii  libstdc++2.10   2.95.2-3       The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 52662-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2000 05:38:42 +0000
Received: (qmail 12311 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2000 05:38:40 -0000
Received: from crash.ab.videon.ca ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 16 Jan 2000 05:38:40 -0000
Received: from wakko.deltatee.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [24.108.53.97])
        by crash.ab.videon.ca (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA10736;
        Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:38:37 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost (wakko.deltatee.com) [127.0.0.1] (jgg)
        by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 2.11 #1)
        id 129iOw-0006rA-00 (Debian); Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:38:58 -0700
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 22:38:58 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Fixed in the latest release

apt (0.3.16) unstable; urgency=low

  * Made --no-download work. Closes: #52993
  * Now compiles on OpenBSD, Solaris and HP-UX
  * Clarify segfault errors
  * More debhelper fixes. Closes: #52662, #54566, #52090, #53531, #54769
  * Fix for Joel's discovery of glibc removal behavoir.
  * Fix for Ben Collins file: uri from slink upgrade.
  * Fixed resume code in FTP. Closes: #54323
  * Take more precautions to prevent the corruption Joey Hess saw.
  * Fixed --no-list-cleanup
  * RFC 2732 URI parsing ([] for hostnames).
  * Typo in apt-cache man page. Closes: #54949

 -- Ben Gertzfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Fri, 14 Jan 2000 08:04:15 -0800

Reply via email to