Your message dated Sat, 1 Apr 2000 14:55:22 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#61512: apt picks wrong packages trough dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2000 11:02:25 +0000
Received: (qmail 2869 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2000 11:02:17 -0000
Received: from modem5.dial.xs4all.be (HELO lucretia.hangar.zo) (195.144.65.5)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2000 11:02:17 -0000
Received: from mechanix by lucretia.hangar.zo with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 12bLdp-0006GG-00; Sat, 01 Apr 2000 13:00:33 +0200
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 13:00:33 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apt picks wrong packages trough dependencies
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn"
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Sender: "Filip Van Raemdonck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Filip Van Raemdonck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
package: apt
version: 0.3.18
severity: normal
This is on an up to date potato system. I needed the glut development package,
and I tried to install it, but apt apparently got confused by dependency
information and wanted to remove my currently installed mesa library in favour
for another:
lucretia:~$ sudo apt-get install glutg3-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libggi2-dev libgii0-dev mesag3+ggi mesag3+ggi-dev
The following packages will be REMOVED:
mesag3-glide2
The following NEW packages will be installed:
glutg3-dev libggi2-dev libgii0-dev mesag3+ggi mesag3+ggi-dev
0 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 1 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 1125kB/1401kB of archives. After unpacking 2897kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
Abort.
lucretia:~$ apt-cache show glutg3-dev
Package: glutg3-dev
Version: 3.7-5
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Maintainer: James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends: libgl-dev, glutg3 (= 3.7-5), libc6-dev
Conflicts: glut-dev
Architecture: i386
Filename: dists/potato/main/binary-i386/devel/glutg3-dev_3.7-5.deb
Size: 199344
MD5sum: b5454fbbb6bd73045cf3a879b75c6a01
Description: Development library for GLUT.
Includes headers, man pages, and static library.
source: glut
installed-size: 656
lucretia:~$ dpkg -l glutg3-dev glutg3 mesag3-glide2 mesag-glide2-dev
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==========================-==========================-======================
pn glutg3-dev <none> (no description
available)
ii glutg3 3.7-5 The OpenGL Utility
Toolkit.
ii mesag3-glide2 3.1-15 A 3-D graphics
library which uses the OpenGL API [libc6].
pn mesag-glide2-dev <none> (no description
available)
Both mesag3+ggi and mesag3-glide2 (which I have installed) provide libgl1; both
mesag3+ggi-dev and mesag-glide2-dev provide libgl-dev, which is needed by
glutg3-dev. However, apparently it thought mesag3+ggi-dev was a better choice
than mesag-glide2-dev. What surprises me most is that it didn't choose mesag3
and mesag-dev, as these could be looked at as the 'normal' mesa packages.
Once I told apt that it should take mesag-glide2-dev it did the right thing:
lucretia:~$ sudo apt-get install mesag-glide2-dev glutg3-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libglide2-dev
The following NEW packages will be installed:
glutg3-dev libglide2-dev mesag-glide2-dev
0 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
Need to get 691kB/3044kB of archives. After unpacking 5360kB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
0% [Connecting to http.us.debian.org]
Regards,
Filip
--
Get a life. Get Windows(tm). It makes you wanna spend a lot less time with your
pc.
<------------------------ Filip Van Raemdonck ----------------------->
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Helpdesk Tel: +32/(0)9/265.02.05
http://www.xs4all.be Webengineering Fax: +32/(0)9/265.02.50
<-------------------- XS4ALL Internet Belgium ---------------------->
--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE45dbREjn3CY6VDgARAXqDAKCfgH54RzGAmcyjCgst1LDbD5nHkgCffDSb
8w2rfpjyo5fB5a33kUm6rhU=
=bd3z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 61512-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2000 21:58:57 +0000
Received: (qmail 20579 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2000 21:58:57 -0000
Received: from wakko.powersurfr.com (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([EMAIL
PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 1 Apr 2000 21:58:57 -0000
Received: from localhost (wakko.deltatee.com) [127.0.0.1] (jgg)
by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 2.11 #1)
id 12bVrW-00015X-00 (Debian); Sat, 1 Apr 2000 14:55:22 -0700
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 14:55:22 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#61512: apt picks wrong packages trough dependencies
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> Once I told apt that it should take mesag-glide2-dev it did the right thing:
This is what you are supposed to do in such instances, if you think it is
a real problem you can contact the maintainers of the respective packages
and have them reorder their dependencies.
Jason
