Your message dated Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:00:02 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Gar
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2000 02:57:01 +0000
Received: (qmail 8446 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2000 02:57:01 -0000
Received: from dewey.mindlink.net (HELO dewey.paralynx.net) (204.174.16.4)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2000 02:57:01 -0000
Received: from vc.bc.ca ([207.6.138.244] helo=vc)
by dewey.paralynx.net with esmtp (Exim 2.11 #1)
id 12St8G-0005XP-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:57:00 -0800
Received: by vc
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Debian Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2); Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:56:59 -0800
(PST)
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 18:56:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Daniel Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apt: apt doesn't use an rsync-ish transfer
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Package: apt
Version: 0.3.16
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I think that APT should use some sort of an rsyncish transfer to get
packages/updates.
This could be done many ways, some of which could be:
* run rsyncd on debian sites(+mirrors)
* have seperate packages with diffs from the last / last few versions
* to keep less clutter, have it at the begginning/end of packages, and
clients could request partial gets
This would greatly reduce the time for download, and the load on the server,
and would increase the updates that people performed ;-).
Another (rather advanced) extra to this would be to have apt re-package
things from the files on your system (when lacking archives) to help do the
rsync.
Enjoy!
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux vc 2.2.13 #1 Mon Dec 20 23:49:37 PST 1999 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.2-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libstdc++2.10 2.95.2-5 The GNU stdc++ library
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
|Daniel Dent | Life is just too |
|[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cryptic. Too bad it |
| | doesn't have the simple |
|Finger for PGP key, or visit: | interface of unix and |
|http://vc.bc.ca/~ddent/pgp/ | tcsh. |
+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=+
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
-----==
----== _
---== (_)__ __ ____ __
--== / / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
The choice of a GNU generation
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 59968-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Sep 2000 01:00:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 16 20:00:04 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from slash.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.210]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13aSoO-0000gb-00; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:00:04 -0500
Received: from wakko.deltatee.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by slash.ab.videon.ca (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA04360
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:00:03 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost (wakko.deltatee.com) [127.0.0.1] (jgg)
by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 2.11 #1)
id 13aSoN-0004rL-00 (Debian); Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:00:03 -0600
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 19:00:02 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gar
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is not a bug that APT does not support something that doesn't exist :P
Rsync does not have the ability to be deployed server-side on a grand
scale.
Jason
