Your message dated Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:12:28 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#80867: apt: Horrible speed measuring.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2000 23:57:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 29 17:57:17 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 200-coru-x5.libre.retevision.es (relativistic) [62.83.56.200]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14C9Oe-0003UA-00; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 17:57:17 -0600
Received: by relativistic (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5CAD82C61F; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:57:09 +0100 (CET)
From: Jesús Carrete Montaña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: Horrible speed measuring.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:57:09 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.3.19
Severity: normal
I use a 56K modem, and quite often apt-get gives me wrong measures of speed:
up to 5000M/s!!! I also think time stimation is much improvable, because it
only evaluates the very current speed, and evaluating a certain period of time
would be more realistic.
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux relativistic 2.4.0-test12-withoutfb #1 sáb dic 23
02:39:30 CET 2000 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libstdc++2.10 2.95.2-14 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 80867-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2000 06:12:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 30 00:12:30 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (cast-ext.ab.videon.ca) [206.75.216.34]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14CFFm-0005PV-00; Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:12:30 -0600
Received: (qmail 16148 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2000 06:12:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by cast-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 30 Dec 2000 06:12:29 -0000
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg)
by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
id 14CFFk-00066N-00; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:12:28 -0700
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:12:28 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs_Carrete_Monta=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#80867: apt: Horrible speed measuring.
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000, Jes=FAs Carrete Monta=F1a wrote:
> I use a 56K modem, and quite often apt-get gives me wrong measures of spe=
ed:
> up to 5000M/s!!! I also think time stimation is much improvable, because =
it
> only evaluates the very current speed, and evaluating a certain period of=
time
> would be more realistic.
Does your clock work? (and/or kernel)
That is the only time I have ever heard of anything like that.
Jason
