Michael Schmitz writes: > > How can I fix this in python-numeric? On a recent unstable system I > > have both blas-dev and lapack-dev installed. Or do the build > > dependencies of blas-dev and lapack-dev, and apt doesn't detect this? > > Sorry if I wasn't perfectly clear about the details: > > The dependencies of blas-dev (-> blas1) and lapack-dev (-> lapack) did > conflict for me. apt refused to install either blas-dev or lapack-dev. > > > > Unpacking lapack (from .../lapack_2.0.1-2.1_m68k.deb) ... > > > Unpacking lapack-dev (from .../lapack-dev_2.0.1-2.1_m68k.deb) ... > > That's the lapack versions, I have no idea what blas versions were > current at that time. I can have another try at installing both blas1 and > lapack (current versions) to see if that changed.
$ dpkg -l blas1 lapack blas-dev lapack-dev apt Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-==============-==============-============================================ ii blas1 1.0-6 A set of building blocks for performing vect ii lapack 3.0-5.1 a comprehensive set of linear algebra routin ii blas-dev 1.0-6 A set of building blocks for performing vect ii lapack-dev 3.0-5.1 a comprehensive set of linear algebra routin ii apt 0.5.3 Advanced front-end for dpkg that's installed together on my system. So I assume I can close the report, because it's resolved in the most recent version.
