Your message dated Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:28:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#102423: no errors on invalid syntax in /etc/apt/preferences
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2001 00:14:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 26 19:14:23 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from morsig.xs4all.nl (mx1.mors.wiggy.net) [::ffff:213.84.43.14]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15F2yN-0000MW-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:14:23 -0500
Received: from wichert by mx1.mors.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15F2yM-0001pv-00; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:14:22 +0200
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: no errors on invalid syntax in /etc/apt/preferences
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:14:22 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.3
Severity: normal
If there is a syntax or other error in the preferences file apt
silently ignores it, which makes it extremely hard to debug
problems.
Wichert.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thunder 2.4.2-ac23-lvm091b6 #2 Fri Mar 23 23:35:00 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-1
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.3-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.010604 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 102423-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jun 2001 07:28:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 28 02:28:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from janeway.cistron.net [::ffff:195.64.65.23]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15FWDt-0003MH-00; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 02:28:21 -0500
Received: from picard.cistron.nl ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.64.65.20])
by janeway.cistron.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id
JAA13685;
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:28:20 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by picard.cistron.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id JAA27348;
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:28:16 +0200
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:28:16 +0200
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#102423: no errors on invalid syntax in /etc/apt/preferences
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, Jun 27, 2001
at 08:59:28PM -0600
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 102423
thanks
Previously Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> As I said, It isn't incorrect, it is an unsupported field, just like any
> other file in that format unsupported fields are ignored. This is so if
> you have to downgrade apt it doesn't break parsing the preferences file.
If you make it a warning apt won't break when you downgrade it, but
people will still notice they made a mistake. Magicaly breaking is
*not* good.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
