Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:35:48 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#105723: APT wants to upgrade non-eligable packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2001 04:06:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 17 23:06:46 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rave.iinet.net.au (staff.iinet.net.au) [::ffff:203.59.130.251]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Mibm-0003kM-00; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 23:06:46 -0500
Received: (qmail 15525 invoked by uid 1027); 18 Jul 2001 04:02:06 -0000
Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2001 04:02:06 -0000
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:02:06 +0800 (WST)
From: James Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: APT wants to upgrade non-eligable packages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.3.19
We need the ability to do automatic upgrades over our network from an
internal repositry. However Apt seems to want to install packages that are
up-to-date. We've tested this with the testing version of Apt as well.
Example -
lawnmower:/home/adi/tftproot/ppxelinux.cfg# apt-get upgrade -u
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be upgraded
bash bsdutils debianutils diff dpkg elvis-tiny fileutils findutils g++
gawk grep gzip hostname login mawk mount perl-5.005-base sed shellutils
sysvinit tar textutils update util-linux
24 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/6622kB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
If I continue with the upgrade, all packages get replaced
sucessfully. Then if I issue the command again, it still wants to upgrade
them. This behavior is very odd - I suspected it was something to do with
the Packages file I am using in my archive, but comparing the entries
against those in our local Debian mirror doesn't show anything odd.
The Packages file in my repository:
www.enderboi.com/Packages.gz
--
James 'Ender' Brown | 'Borrowed from Slashdot quote of the month:
Network Operations | Calling Mozilla unresponsive is like calling
____________________| a Nuclear bomb somewhat powerful.'
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 105723-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2001 16:36:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 18 11:36:09 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from crack-ext.ab.videon.ca [::ffff:206.75.216.33]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15MuIz-0008KW-00; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:36:09 -0500
Received: (qmail 10454 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2001 16:35:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.108.173.63])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by crack-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 18 Jul 2001 16:35:54 -0000
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg)
by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
id 15MuIf-0008OX-00; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:35:49 -0600
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:35:48 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: James Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#105723: APT wants to upgrade non-eligable packages
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, James Brown wrote:
> We need the ability to do automatic upgrades over our network from an
> internal repositry. However Apt seems to want to install packages that are
> up-to-date. We've tested this with the testing version of Apt as well.
You need to change the version number when you recompile a package.
Jason
