Your message dated Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:50:34 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2001 01:45:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 19 19:45:25 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chardonnay.math.bme.hu [152.66.83.144]
([rUJ8vQb+6VNNVkL0YVtc+2wUHIZFbSmH])
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 165zyX-0001vD-00; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 19:45:25 -0600
Received: (qmail 828 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Nov 2001 01:45:22 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "KORN Andras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: Weird dependency resolver problem - aptitude uninstallable
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.36
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.36
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 02:45:22 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal
Hi,
look at this:
chardonnay:store/debmirror# apt-get -d -o 'Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true'
install aptitude
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Starting
Starting 2
Investigating aptitude
Package aptitude has broken dep on libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2
Considering apt 9 as a solution to aptitude 9999
Considering apt 9 as a solution to aptitude 9999
Considering apt 9 as a solution to aptitude 9999
Considering apt 9 as a solution to aptitude 9999
Considering apt 9 as a solution to aptitude 9999
Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
aptitude: Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2
E: Sorry, broken packages
But:
chardonnay:store/debmirror# apt-cache show apt
Package: apt
Priority: important
Section: base
Installed-Size: 1984
Maintainer: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.5.4
Replaces: libapt-pkg-doc (<< 0.3.7), libapt-pkg-dev (<< 0.3.7)
Provides: libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.3-7), libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
Suggests: dpkg-dev
Filename: pool/main/a/apt/apt_0.5.4_i386.deb
Size: 614918
MD5sum: 98fe513cb584bbaafb7496707d6f119d
Description: Advanced front-end for dpkg
[several times due to many entries in sources.list]
So, apt provides 'libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2'. Naturally, apt is installed.
Why can't aptitude be installed then?
Andrew
--
Andrew Korn (Korn Andras) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp key. QOTD:
Quick, get me a hammer! There's a fly in my soup.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux chardonnay
2.4.12-ac1+pspa+crypto+lvm+ippers+medusa+netfilter-chardonnay #1 Fri Oct 12
23:15:54 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=hu_HU, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.011006 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 120291-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2001 06:50:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 26 00:50:36 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (skip-ext.ab.videon.ca) [206.75.216.36]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16J7tc-0003in-00; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 00:50:36 -0600
Received: (qmail 14651 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2001 06:50:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.deltatee.com) ([24.82.81.190])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by skip-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 26 Dec 2001 06:50:35 -0000
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.deltatee.com ident=jgg)
by wakko.deltatee.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
id 16J7tb-0000iF-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:50:35 -0700
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 23:50:34 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The report shows the problem, the installed version of APT inexplicably
does not provide exactly the correct version and yet has the same version
number.
Jason
