Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:46:18 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2001 21:07:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 02 16:07:44 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from femail24.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.149]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15oWlQ-0004Lj-00; Tue, 02 Oct 2001 16:07:40 -0500
Received: from c462085-a.stcla1.sfba.home.com ([24.19.158.213])
by femail24.sdc1.sfba.home.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:07:26 -0700
Received: from grey.zorzella.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (8.12.0.Beta19/8.12.0.Beta19/Debian 8.12.0.Beta19) with
ESMTP id f92L7QZ9006457;
Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:07:26 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by grey.zorzella.com (8.12.0.Beta19/8.12.0.Beta19/Debian 8.12.0.Beta19)
id f92L7PWV006456;
Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:07:25 -0700
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:07:25 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Luiz-Otavio L. Zorzella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: --target-release does not work with "upgrade" and "dist-upgrade"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal
Though not explicitly documented, the following command do not work
in a logical way (explained hereafter):
# apt-get --target-release testing upgrade
IMHO, the expected outcome of this command is that a system would be
upgraded to 'testing'. I.e. all packages that are to be upgraded would
be upgraded to the version available at the 'testing' distribution,
and packages that are already up-to-date with the version at 'testing'
would not be upgraded at all.
Currently, if, say, 'stable', 'testing' and 'unstable' are present in
the sources.list, the given command would upgrade packages that are
not up-to-date with 'testing' (if any) properly, but for packages that
are already up-to-date with 'testing', the system would upgrade them
to 'unstable' (if a newer version exists).
E.g. (from my actual system): my system is completely up-to-date with
'woody' (with some packages from 'unstable'). I, then, installed
stable's version of 'pacman', and run this command (with a "-s", of
course :^>). The system wants to upgrade all packages to 'unstable',
with the exception of pacman, which it wants to upgrade to 'testing'.
As for "dist-upgrade", a similar reasoning can be applied.
In other words, these commands should behave as if the 'unstable' and
'stable' entries of the sources.list do not even _exist_.
The only "sticking point" is when -- if ever -- to downgrade a package
if it is newer than the target-release. I think this would only be
appropriate if the user explicitly requests this.
Thanks,
Zorzella
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux purple 2.2.18 #1 Sun Jan 14 08:53:46 PST 2001 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-0.01090 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 114240-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2002 07:46:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 26 01:46:19 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from skip-ext.ab.videon.ca [206.75.216.36]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16plet-0006ec-00; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 01:46:19 -0600
Received: (qmail 28287 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2002 07:46:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.debian.net) ([24.86.210.128])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by skip-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 26 Mar 2002 07:46:18 -0000
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.debian.net ident=jgg)
by wakko.debian.net with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
id 16ples-0006Th-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:46:18 -0700
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 00:46:18 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not a bug..
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No answer, not a bug.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
