Your message dated Sat, 11 May 2002 13:44:19 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146638: apt: incorrect parsing of apt-cache search 
--names-only nonfree
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2002 13:20:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 11 08:20:21 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 80-24-13-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es (aragorn) [80.24.13.86] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 176WnN-0005OX-00; Sat, 11 May 2002 08:20:21 -0500
Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 176S6y-0001Zn-00; Sat, 11 May 2002 10:20:16 +0200
From: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: incorrect parsing of apt-cache search --names-only nonfree
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 10:20:16 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search --names-only nonfree
tetex-extra - extra teTeX library files
bsdgames-nonfree - collection of text games from BSD systems - nonfree
gimp1.2-nonfree - GIF support for the GNU Image Manipulation Program
netpbm-nonfree - Graphics conversion tools (nonfree).
xfonts-scalable-nonfree - non-free Type1 and TrueType fonts from XFree86
ssh-askpass-nonfree - empty transitional package
ssh-nonfree - empty transitional package
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$

why is tetex-extra displayed? maybe because the next line contains
"nonfree" twice?

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux aragorn 2.4.18 #1 Sat Apr 13 21:19:47 CEST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.2.5-6    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2        1:2.95.4-8 The GNU stdc++ library


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 146638-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2002 19:44:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 11 14:44:21 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cast-ext.ab.videon.ca [206.75.216.34] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 176cmz-000805-00; Sat, 11 May 2002 14:44:21 -0500
Received: (qmail 24494 invoked from network); 11 May 2002 19:44:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wakko.debian.net) ([24.86.210.128]) 
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
          by cast-ext.ab.videon.ca (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 11 May 2002 19:44:20 -0000
Received: from localhost
        ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.debian.net ident=jgg)
        by wakko.debian.net with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
        id 176cmx-0000Ld-00; Sat, 11 May 2002 13:44:19 -0600
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 13:44:19 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#146638: apt: incorrect parsing of apt-cache search 
--names-only nonfree
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


On Sat, 11 May 2002, Robert Millan wrote:

> why is tetex-extra displayed? maybe because the next line contains
> "nonfree" twice?

tetex-extra provides tetex-nonfree so it is shown as well.

Jason


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to