On Wed, 15 May 2002, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> It looks to me as if it would be best to rip ssl.c out of stunnel and put > it into the apt codebase as is, 1:1 without change and just make Perhaps, it depends somewhat on the license too.. > ssl.c seems to be very clean and handles a lot of stuff and leaves open a > lot of options on how to handle certificates, authentication etc. If we Well, you don't really want alot of options, you just want to have it work :> You have to decide if you want to implement the full HTTP type checking with authoritative signers/etc, or something simpler.. Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
