Your message dated Sun, 02 Jun 2002 15:10:38 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#148834: apt: Problem with problem solver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2002 19:48:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 02 14:48:53 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zensunni.demon.nl [212.238.195.120] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17EbLQ-00009v-00; Sun, 02 Jun 2002 14:48:52 -0500
Received: from ray by zensunni.demon.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17EbLJ-00028O-00; Sun, 02 Jun 2002 21:48:45 +0200
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:48:45 +0200
From: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: Problem with problem solver
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.31
Organization: Ray at home
X-System: Debian GNU/Linux 3.0, kernel 2.4.19-pre9-ac2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: important
Justification: breaks 'pbuilder build' for woody packages that build-depend on
debhelper
I have a system that has pbuilder installed which provides me with an up to
date woody chroot (using up to date sources
deb http://ftp.debian.nl/debian woody main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main contrib
non-free
):
pbuilder update --distribution woody
pbuilder login --distribution woody
In this environment, I get strange behaviour from apt:
bin/bash-2.05a# dpkg -l debconf
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
|uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii debconf 1.1.10 Debian configuration management system
bin/bash-2.05a# apt-get install debhelper
[...]
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
debhelper: Depends: debconf-utils but it is not going to be installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
bin/bash-2.05a# apt-get install debconf-utils
[...]
debconf-utils: Depends: debconf (>= 0.9.59) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
apt-get -oDebug::pkgProblemResolver=yes install debhelper results in
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Starting
Starting 2
Investigating debconf
Package debconf has broken dep on debconf-utils
Considering debconf-utils 1 as a solution to debconf 69
Added debconf-utils to the remove list
Fixing debconf via keep of debconf-utils
Investigating debhelper
Package debhelper has broken dep on debconf-utils
Considering debconf-utils 1 as a solution to debhelper 9999
Re-Instated debconf-utils
Investigating debconf
Package debconf has broken dep on debconf-utils
Considering debconf-utils 1 as a solution to debconf 69
Added debconf-utils to the remove list
Fixing debconf via keep of debconf-utils
Investigating debhelper
Package debhelper has broken dep on debconf-utils
Considering debconf-utils 1 as a solution to debhelper 9999
Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
debhelper: Depends: debconf-utils but it is not going to be installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
apt-get -oDebug::pkgProblemResolver=yes install debconf-utils results in
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Starting
Starting 2
Investigating debconf
Package debconf has broken dep on debconf-utils
Considering debconf-utils 9999 as a solution to debconf 69
Removing debconf rather than change debconf-utils
Investigating console-common
Package console-common has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to console-common 15
Removing console-common rather than change debconf
Investigating binutils
Package binutils has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to binutils 15
Removing binutils rather than change debconf
Investigating ipchains
Package ipchains has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to ipchains 10
Removing ipchains rather than change debconf
Investigating bsdmainutils
Package bsdmainutils has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to bsdmainutils 9
Removing bsdmainutils rather than change debconf
Investigating netbase
Or group remove for netbase
Or group remove for netbase
Or group remove for netbase
Package netbase has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to netbase 8
Removing netbase rather than change debconf
Investigating iptables
Package iptables has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to iptables 8
Removing iptables rather than change debconf
Investigating console-data
Package console-data has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to console-data 5
Removing console-data rather than change debconf
Investigating adduser
Package adduser has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to adduser 5
Removing adduser rather than change debconf
Investigating dpkg-dev
Package dpkg-dev has broken dep on binutils
Considering binutils 15 as a solution to dpkg-dev 5
Removing dpkg-dev rather than change binutils
Investigating console-tools
Package console-tools has broken dep on console-common
Considering console-common 15 as a solution to console-tools 4
Removing console-tools rather than change console-common
Investigating ppp
Package ppp has broken dep on netbase
Considering netbase 8 as a solution to ppp 4
Removing ppp rather than change netbase
Investigating man-db
Or group remove for man-db
Package man-db has broken dep on bsdmainutils
Considering bsdmainutils 9 as a solution to man-db 4
Removing man-db rather than change bsdmainutils
Investigating setserial
Package setserial has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to setserial 3
Removing setserial rather than change debconf
Investigating pppoe
Package pppoe has broken dep on ppp
Considering ppp 4 as a solution to pppoe 1
Removing pppoe rather than change ppp
Investigating pppconfig
Package pppconfig has broken dep on ppp
Considering ppp 4 as a solution to pppconfig 0
Removing pppconfig rather than change ppp
Investigating pppoeconf
Or group remove for pppoeconf
Package pppoeconf has broken dep on pppoe
Considering pppoe 1 as a solution to pppoeconf 0
Removing pppoeconf rather than change pppoe
Investigating base-config
Package base-config has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to base-config 0
Removing base-config rather than change debconf
Investigating build-essential
Or group remove for build-essential
Package build-essential has broken dep on dpkg-dev
Considering dpkg-dev 5 as a solution to build-essential 0
Removing build-essential rather than change dpkg-dev
Investigating pcmcia-cs
Package pcmcia-cs has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to pcmcia-cs -1
Removing pcmcia-cs rather than change debconf
Investigating debconf-utils
Package debconf-utils has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to debconf-utils 9999
Added debconf to the remove list
Fixing debconf-utils via keep of debconf
Investigating debconf
Package debconf has broken dep on debconf-utils
Considering debconf-utils 9999 as a solution to debconf 69
Removing debconf rather than change debconf-utils
Investigating gcc-2.95
Package gcc-2.95 has broken dep on binutils
Considering binutils 15 as a solution to gcc-2.95 22
Added binutils to the remove list
Fixing gcc-2.95 via keep of binutils
Investigating binutils
Package binutils has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to binutils 15
Removing binutils rather than change debconf
Investigating debconf-utils
Package debconf-utils has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 69 as a solution to debconf-utils 9999
Added debconf to the remove list
Fixing debconf-utils via keep of debconf
Investigating debconf
Package debconf has broken dep on debconf-utils
Considering debconf-utils 9999 as a solution to debconf 9999
Removing debconf rather than change debconf-utils
Investigating gcc-2.95
Package gcc-2.95 has broken dep on binutils
Considering binutils 15 as a solution to gcc-2.95 22
Added binutils to the remove list
Fixing gcc-2.95 via keep of binutils
Investigating binutils
Package binutils has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 9999 as a solution to binutils 22
Removing binutils rather than change debconf
Investigating debconf-utils
Package debconf-utils has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 9999 as a solution to debconf-utils 9999
Considering debconf 9999 as a solution to debconf-utils 9999
Investigating gcc-2.95
Package gcc-2.95 has broken dep on binutils
Considering binutils 9999 as a solution to gcc-2.95 22
Removing gcc-2.95 rather than change binutils
Investigating g++-2.95
Package g++-2.95 has broken dep on gcc-2.95
Considering gcc-2.95 9999 as a solution to g++-2.95 11
Removing g++-2.95 rather than change gcc-2.95
Investigating gcc
Package gcc has broken dep on gcc-2.95
Considering gcc-2.95 9999 as a solution to gcc 10
Removing gcc rather than change gcc-2.95
Investigating g++
Package g++ has broken dep on g++-2.95
Considering g++-2.95 9999 as a solution to g++ 8
Removing g++ rather than change g++-2.95
Investigating libstdc++2.10-dev
Package libstdc++2.10-dev has broken dep on g++-2.95
Considering g++-2.95 9999 as a solution to libstdc++2.10-dev 7
Removing libstdc++2.10-dev rather than change g++-2.95
Investigating debconf-utils
Package debconf-utils has broken dep on debconf
Considering debconf 9999 as a solution to debconf-utils 9999
Considering debconf 9999 as a solution to debconf-utils 9999
Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
debconf-utils: Depends: debconf (>= 0.9.59) but it is not going to be
installed
E: Sorry, broken packages
-- System Information
[up to date pbuilder chroot of woody]
--
Obsig: developing a new sig
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 148834-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2002 21:11:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 02 16:11:10 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h24-71-223-10.cg.shawcable.net (pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca)
[24.71.223.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17Ecd4-0004ZV-00; Sun, 02 Jun 2002 16:11:10 -0500
Received: from pd5mr2so.prod.shaw.ca
(pd5mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.233]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun,
02 Jun 2002 15:10:39 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml2so.prod.shaw.ca
(pn2ml2so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.146]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun,
02 Jun 2002 15:10:39 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from wakko.debian.net
(h24-86-210-128.ed.shawcable.net [24.86.210.128])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun,
02 Jun 2002 15:10:38 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.debian.net ident=jgg)
by wakko.debian.net with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
id 17EccY-0006Te-00; Sun, 02 Jun 2002 15:10:38 -0600
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 15:10:38 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#148834: apt: Problem with problem solver
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> In this environment, I get strange behaviour from apt:
Er, how is this strange? This is what you get if you ask for something
impossible. It looks like (your) debconf, debconf-utils and debhelper have
mutually exclusive dependencies.
You might try:
apt-get install debconf debconf-utils debhelper
And you may be able to better understand the exact nature of the problem.
> [up to date pbuilder chroot of woody]
Er, no it isn't. Debconf in woddy is 1.0.32, you have 1.1.10 installed.
Looks to me like you are trying to mix woody and sid package in a manner
that is not possible.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
