Your message dated Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:44:03 -0600 (MDT)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#165365: apt: APT::Default-Release should accept release
codenames
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2002 14:55:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 18 09:55:34 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns1.alcove-solutions.com (smtp-out.fr.alcove.com)
[212.155.209.139]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 182YXF-000052-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:55:34 -0500
Received: from vitel.alcove-fr ([10.16.10.8])
by smtp-out.fr.alcove.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 182YVs-0006r0-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:54:08 +0200
Received: from ydirson by vitel.alcove-fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 182YX2-0007IR-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:55:20 +0200
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 16:55:20 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: APT::Default-Release should accept release codenames
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal
There are currently a number of features in testing that justify
having a production server point both to woody as stable, and to
testing. In this case, the APT::Default-Release setting should be
"woody". I don't want to ever see "stable" here, as I want to control
when transitionning from woody to sarge, and already saw customers
with _broken_ machines halfway between potato and woody, just because
their sources.list blithely pointed to "stable".
However, I can't just use codenames - even with "install
package/release", although I thought this one had worked in the past.
It looks like the codename should be added to Release files for the
necessary information to be available ?
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux vitel 2.4.19-station #1 Tue Aug 6 11:36:58 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=french, LC_CTYPE=french
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-7 The GNU stdc++ library
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support manager Responsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres
Debian developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Développeur Debian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 165365-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2002 17:45:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 18 12:45:50 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net (pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca)
[24.71.223.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 182bC2-0001gV-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:45:50 -0500
Received: from pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr2so-ser.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.109])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri,
18 Oct 2002 11:44:05 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca
(pn2ml7so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.151]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri,
18 Oct 2002 11:44:05 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from wakko.debian.net ([24.86.210.128])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri,
18 Oct 2002 11:44:04 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.debian.net ident=jgg)
by wakko.debian.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 182bAK-0003Is-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:44:04 -0600
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:44:03 -0600 (MDT)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#165365: apt: APT::Default-Release should accept release
codenames
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.1 required=5.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Yann Dirson wrote:
> It looks like the codename should be added to Release files for the
> necessary information to be available ?
You should use the release version numbers.
Jason
