reopen 165365 thanks As stated in my last mail, this does not quite satisfy me, although it solves the most widespread situation.
In sources.list what we write is "stable" or "woody" (although I urge everyone NEVER to use "stable" in their sources.list), not 3.0. It is really inconsistent (in addition to being less powerful, with no apparent reason) not to be able to use the same names in DefaultRelease and such. The reason why I simply don't fgo and ile a patch is that this will require changes to other tools as well (eg. those generating Release files), which I mostly have no idea where to find, and that will surely require approval from several people before being accepted. -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/ Technical support manager Responsable de l'assistance technique Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres Debian developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Développeur Debian
