Your message dated Sun, 10 Nov 2002 21:35:09 -0600 (CST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closed in 0.5.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 May 2001 01:34:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 22 20:34:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from as5800-83-239.access.naxs.com (silk.kitenet.net) [216.98.83.239] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 152NXX-0003rc-00; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:34:20 -0500
Received: from joey by silk.kitenet.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 152NbO-0007qZ-00; Tue, 22 May 2001 21:38:18 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-extracttemplates fils for man-db
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.16
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.16
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:38:15 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: apt-utils
Version: 0.5.3
Severity: normal

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/joey/debian/packages/debconf>apt-extracttemplates 
/var/cache/apt/archives/man-db_2.3.18-5_i386.deb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/joey/debian/packages/debconf>

That is not the expected result. Man-db uses debconf, and has a
templates file. It does have a versioned dependancy on debconf >= 0.2.0,
but of course I have a much newer version of debconf installed, 0.9.59.
So why is apt-extracttemplates not extracting the templates file?

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux silk 2.4.4 #2 Fri May 11 22:25:05 EDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages apt-utils depends on:
ii  apt [libapt-pkg-libc6. 0.5.3             Advanced front-end for dpkg       
ii  libc6                  2.2.3-1           GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdb2                 2:2.7.7-8         The Berkeley database routines (ru
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.010506 The GNU stdc++ library            


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 98451-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2002 03:35:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 10 21:35:15 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 12-239-172-122.client.attbi.com (lapdoog.doogie.org) 
[12.239.172.122] (uucp)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18B5M2-0004On-00; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 21:35:15 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
        by lapdoog.doogie.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 18B5Lz-00087C-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 10 Nov 2002 21:35:11 -0600
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 21:35:09 -0600 (CST)
From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: closed in 0.5.3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

See $subject.


Reply via email to