Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:47:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line apt needs rebuilt for prelinking
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2003 04:11:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 11 22:11:59 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (bromo.msbb.uc.edu) [129.137.3.146]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18XZTV-0007KQ-00; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:11:54 -0600
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bromo.msbb.uc.edu (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA93900
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 23:11:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 23:11:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apt needs rebuilt for prelinking
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
On debian ppc sid, the current apt package contains binaries
which fail to prelink do to being built with a very old version of
binutils. A simple rebuild with the current binutils in sid will solve
this and eliminate the current error...
prelink: /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2.so.3.2.0: Not enough room to add
.dynamic entry
...one gets when trying to prelink that file. This error is indicative
of the binary not having the necessary fields for the prelinking information
to be stored in.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 176343-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2003 08:47:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 12 02:47:31 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18XdmF-0003S8-00; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:47:31 -0600
Received: from 209-6-103-23.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com
([209.6.103.23] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
id 18XdmF-0003o5-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:47:31 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18XdmE-0005XT-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:47:30 -0500
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:47:30 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: apt needs rebuilt for prelinking
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
No, it really doesn't. But even if it did, apt needs to be uploaded
eventually to fix other bugs, and will be rebuilt anyway, so there's no need
to file a bug about it.
--
- mdz
