Your message dated Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:16:03 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#176928: apt: say upgraded instead of installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2003 23:12:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 15 17:12:17 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Ywhl-0004lH-00; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 17:12:17 -0600
Received: from tc210-203-44-148.3-16.pl.ebtnet.net ([210.203.44.148]
helo=jidanni.org)
by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
id 18Ywhk-0005QL-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:12:17 -0500
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18YujX-0000SG-00; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 05:05:59 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: say upgraded instead of installed
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.2
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 05:05:59 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: minor
File: /usr/bin/apt-get
# apt-get install fetchmail
...The following extra packages will be installed: [1]
fetchmailconf libc6 libc6-dev locales ...
# apt-get install -u fetchmail
...The following extra packages will be installed: [2]
fetchmailconf libc6 libc6-dev locales ...
...The following packages will be upgraded [3]
fetchmailconf libc6 libc6-dev locales ...
Why not always output 3 instead of 1 and 2?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-k7 #1 Sun Oct 6 20:29:56 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-12 The GNU stdc++ library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 176928-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2003 18:16:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 16 12:16:04 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net (pd3mo3so.prod.shaw.ca)
[24.71.223.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ZEYe-0008Ll-00; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:16:04 -0600
Received: from pd6mr1so.prod.shaw.ca
(pd6mr1so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.216]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:16:03 -0700 (MST)
Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca
(pn2ml7so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.151]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:16:03 -0700 (MST)
Received: from wakko.debian.net ([24.86.195.248])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:16:03 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.debian.net ident=jgg)
by wakko.debian.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18ZEYd-0005nm-00; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:16:03 -0700
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:16:03 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#176928: apt: say upgraded instead of installed
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> # apt-get install fetchmail
> ...The following extra packages will be installed: [1]
> fetchmailconf libc6 libc6-dev locales ...
> # apt-get install -u fetchmail
> ...The following extra packages will be installed: [2]
> fetchmailconf libc6 libc6-dev locales ...
> ...The following packages will be upgraded [3]
> fetchmailconf libc6 libc6-dev locales ...
>
> Why not always output 3 instead of 1 and 2?
3 is generally not as usefull as 1. 1 tells you what is going to happen
in addition to what you asked explicitly for.
-u is really only meaningful for dist-upgrade and upgrade which don't
usually list upgradeded packages, only removed/installed packages.
Jason
