Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:48:41 -0700 (MST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#167899: apt: Another case of repeated 'updates' to the
same version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Nov 2002 16:01:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 05 10:01:20 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mxs01p57lpsadm.sadm.fh-htwchur.ch) [193.5.58.254]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18968m-0001tC-00; Tue, 05 Nov 2002 10:01:20 -0600
Received: from workstation ([10.0.118.57]) by mxs01p57lpsadm.sadm.fh-htwchur.ch
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966);
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:04:45 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Andy =?iso-8859-1?q?T=F6nz?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: FH HTW Chur
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apt-get tries to update already up2date packages
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:01:32 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Nov 2002 16:04:45.0384 (UTC)
FILETIME=[0F002480:01C284E5]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0
tests=NOSPAM_INC,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
apt-get tries to update packages which are already up2date.
dunno why this happens :(
> apt-get upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be upgraded
libqt3 libqt3-dev libqt3-mt libqt3-mt-dev libqxt0 qt3-tools
6 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/13.8MB of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
> dpkg -p libqt3
Package: libqt3
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 6218
Maintainer: Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Source: qt-x11-free
Version: 2:3.0.5-4
Replaces: libqt3-gl, qt3-tools (<< 2:3.0.2-20020306-1)
Depends: libc6 (>=3D 2.2.4-4), libjpeg62, libmng1 (>=3D 1.0.3-1), libpng3=
,=20
libqt3-mt (>=3D 2:3.0.5-4), libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 (>=3D 1:2.95.4-0.01081=
0),=20
xlibmesa3 | libgl1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0), zlib1g (>=3D 1:1.1.4)
Suggests: libqt3-psql, libqt3-mysql, libqt3-odbc, anti-aliasing-howto
Conflicts: libqt3-gl
Filename: pool/main/q/qt-x11-free/libqt3_3.0.0.0-6_i386.deb
Size: 2475346
MD5sum: 3d0fe182c4996a5476d7fe5109c4e642
dpkg -s libqt3
Package: libqt3
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 6218
Maintainer: Martin Loschwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: qt-x11-free
Version: 2:3.0.5-4
Replaces: libqt3-gl, qt3-tools (<< 2:3.0.2-20020306-1)
Depends: libc6 (>=3D 2.2.4-4), libjpeg62, libmng1 (>=3D 1.0.3-1), libpng3=
,=20
libqt3-mt (>=3D 2:3.0.5-4), libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 (>=3D 1:2.95.4-0.01081=
0),=20
xlibmesa3 | libgl1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0), zlib1g (>=3D 1:1.1.4)
Suggests: libqt3-psql, libqt3-mysql, libqt3-odbc, anti-aliasing-howto
Conflicts: libqt3-gl
> dpkg -s apt
Package: apt
Status: install ok installed
Priority: important
Section: base
Installed-Size: 1984
Maintainer: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 0.5.4
Replaces: libapt-pkg-doc (<< 0.3.7), libapt-pkg-dev (<< 0.3.7)
Provides: libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2
Depends: libc6 (>=3D 2.2.3-7), libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
Suggests: dpkg-dev
No idea what the problem could be :(
tried to delete the availables, updated afterwards... nothing helps.
Can set the packages to hold to prevent this effect. But I don't think th=
at=20
this is a real solution for the problem :(
My system
up2date testing, kernel 2.4.19
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 167899-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2003 17:48:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 20 11:48:47 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net (pd5mo2so.prod.shaw.ca)
[24.71.223.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ag2R-0007RU-00; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:48:47 -0600
Received: from pd6mr2so.prod.shaw.ca
(pd6mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.217]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,
20 Jan 2003 10:48:46 -0700 (MST)
Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca
(pn2ml7so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.151]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,
20 Jan 2003 10:48:46 -0700 (MST)
Received: from wakko.debian.net ([24.86.195.248])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 12 2002))
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon,
20 Jan 2003 10:48:46 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wakko.debian.net ident=jgg)
by wakko.debian.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18ag2L-0002FG-00; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:48:41 -0700
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:48:41 -0700 (MST)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#167899: apt: Another case of repeated 'updates' to the same
version
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.8 required=5.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Daniel M=FCller wrote:
> Apt does install the same version of several packages each time I run
> "apt-get upgrade". One of them is "swat" (version 2.2.3a-6.ipv6.r1):
Yeah, it's supposed to. somehow you have 3 different .debs with
mismatching headers. You need to change the version numbers if you
recompile the package.
Jason
