Your message dated Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:24:44 -0600 (CST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#181040: apt: prefer large .debs from cdrom, small .debs 
from internet
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2003 22:44:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 14 16:44:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.apol.com.tw (smtp.apol.com.tw) [203.79.224.62] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18joZg-0004mU-00; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:44:52 -0600
Received: from jidanni.org (TC210-203-44-28.3-16.pl.ebtnet.net [210.203.44.28])
        by smtp.apol.com.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA1119553
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:45:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18jo9O-00033E-00; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:17:42 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: prefer large .debs from cdrom, small .debs from internet
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:17:42 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/apt-get

it would be nice to have a way in preferences to say that for small
files, get them over the internet, large ones get them from cdrom,
when versions are equal of course.

one would theoretically add a few priority points for files over a
certain size...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-k7 #1 Sun Oct 6 20:29:56 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5

Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii  libc6                        2.3.1-10    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2       1:2.95.4-15 The GNU stdc++ library

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181040-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2003 04:24:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 14 22:24:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 12-239-172-122.client.attbi.com (yakko.doogie.org) 
[12.239.172.122] (uucp)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18jtsf-0002v9-00; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:24:49 -0600
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (uucp)
        by yakko.doogie.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 18jtsb-0001qb-00; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:24:45 -0600
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:24:44 -0600 (CST)
From: Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#181040: apt: prefer large .debs from cdrom, small .debs from
 internet
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
        tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
              SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_PINE
        version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Dan Jacobson wrote:

> it would be nice to have a way in preferences to say that for small
> files, get them over the internet, large ones get them from cdrom,
> when versions are equal of course.

Place the cdrom lines first.  Why would you ever want to get anything over a
remote connection, if it was available locally?

Reply via email to