On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > > > I've just done another merge between APT and APT-RPM, and noticed that > > you have downgraded the version in the changelog to 0.5.4.9. > > I think that is only until an offical release into debian is made. The > 0.5.4.*'s seem to be pre releases that Adam is making for testing. I would > like the next official one in debian to be 0.5.5, I don't see a reason > for Adam to use a different version number.
Yeah, that was my plan. I may make one more test release. Current cvs has a ton more messages marked with _(). A few that probably shouldn't, and a few that probably still should. Jason, I am going to have to remove alot of the stream << handling. :| I'm slowly going thru the existing bugs, applying simple fixes(docs, etc). After I get most of those done, I'll do bug merging. > > Is there any place (mailing list, irc channel, etc) where you discuss > > APT development? I belive everybody would benefit if we get closer. > > The list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I _think_ I saw a message > indicating it was unmoderated. These days it's mostly just bug > reports from Dan Jacobson though ;> Yes, I caught one of the listmasters on irc, and poked him. > > You both are also welcome to the apt-rpm list [1], if you find it > > interesting. We have a pretty active community of users and > > contributors there. I really don't know much about deep apt internals, and am not qualified to merge features like this. > Someone else made a partial perl binding too, but I'm not sure where it > went.. apt-cache show libapt-pkg-perl. Done by the perl maintainer. I need to get back to my java bindings for it some day.
