Your message dated 23 Feb 2003 21:15:29 -0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2001 11:04:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 17 06:04:12 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gate.westel900.hu [194.176.224.33]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15toUZ-0006KP-00; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 06:04:08 -0500
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:57:41 +0200
From: Janos Holanyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-get -d install <package> doesn't work as documented
Reply-To: Janos Holanyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.30
Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal
Hi,
Given the following exceprt from the apt-get(8) manpage:
-d
--download-only
Download only; package files are only retrieved,
not unpacked or installed. Configuration Item:
APT::Get::Download-Only.
and the actual behavior of apt-get, e.g.:
# apt-get -d install ssh
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Sorry, ssh is already the newest version.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 31 not upgraded.
there is a contradiction: apt-get still wants to install the package.
If it wouldn't want to, it had downloaded the package and had left it in
/var/cache/apt/archives.
There are several ways we could solve this contradiction:
1. make a new apt-get command, e.g.: apt-get deb <package>
2. correct the manpage, e.g.: s/"package files are only retrieved, not
unpacked or installed."/"the regular install procedure of apt-get(8)
stops right after retrieving the package. It doesn't retrieve the package
if it is already installed and if the dependencies are not met."/
3. any more ideas?
Thanks.
BR,
Csan
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux holanyij 2.4.10 #1 Sat Sep 29 02:12:03 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.011006 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 115953-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 2003 22:10:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 23 16:10:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (mx1.signalar.net) [200.32.3.109]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18n4Kk-0001g0-00; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 16:10:56 -0600
Received: (qmail 26113 invoked by uid 1159); 23 Feb 2003 21:15:29 -0000
Date: 23 Feb 2003 21:15:29 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
subject: (no subject)
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,SUPERLONG_LINE
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Este formulario fue enviado por
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Domingo, Febrero 23, 2003 at 18:15:29
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
realname: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fgr:
Hey!! What's Up? I'm *Stacy* 20/F/San Diego/Webcam & Pics. I'm *LIVE* on my
*FREE* Webcam mostly 24/7 so if you wanna come in and chat or see me go to my
Personal Homepage at http://www.freewebcamchicks.net and i'll talk to you in a
bit hun! If you join and the webchat is already full im sorry, just wait like 5
minutes and then you'll be able to see me LIVE!! *Remember* this is my Personal
Homepage so of course its *FREE* =)
<333 *Stacy* <333
PS.Remember my Personal Homepage is http://www.freewebcamchicks.net and
hopefully I can chat with you soon!! oh yah!! If you don't have a webcam of
your own its ok!! You can still watch and chat with me then!! ok!! ByE!!
<333 *Stacy* <333
c1dww
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
