Your message dated 12 May 2003 20:22:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 0.5.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2001 22:39:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 25 17:39:47 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-209-233-16-176.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (gbr.newt.com)
[209.233.16.176]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15wtAB-00017V-00; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:39:47 -0500
Received: from gbr.newt.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by gbr.newt.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id f9PMdisd031681;
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:39:44 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by gbr.newt.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) id f9PMdh5q031679;
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:39:43 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-preferences man page unclear
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.31
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.31
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:39:43 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal
Tags: woody
[Originally posted to debian-user. Included in entirety for context,
and additional comments not in the original note are found in square
brackets, like this one.]
I asked myself the questions: How do I add the occaisional unstable
package to my testing system in a better way than downloading debs
and using dpkg to install them? How do I track packages in testing
that I originally got out of unstable? Finally, and less often, how
do I track a particular package in unstable?
I searched the archives, discovered preferences, and read the
apt-preferences man page. I came up with this:
Package: *
Pin: release a=testing
Pin-Priority: 600
Package: *
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 80
Package: netsaint
Pin: release a=unstable
Pin-Priority: 601
I learned that I could install an unstable package by appending
/unstable to the package name, like this:
apt-get install netsaint/unstable
From then on, apt-get update/upgrade should do the Right Thing.
Right? Does this configuration answer my questions above?
[The man page should answer that.]
The apt-preferences man page is baffling. It definitely needs
examples (like the one above). It needs better explanations. For
example, Joey once included this preferences file:
> Package: *
> Pin: release a=testing
> Pin-Priority: 900
>
> Package: *
> Pin: release o=Debian
> Pin-Priority: -10
Even after pouring over the apt-preferences man page a few times, I
have no idea what is meant by the second stanza.
[The explanation of the Pin-Priority field is very clear, although
specific suggestions of priorities to use would be welcome. The
description of the Pin field is the most baffling part of the man
page and requires the most attention.]
Examples should be added to /usr/share/doc/apt as well.
[That this feature exists in the code rocks, thanks! Better
documentation will allow us to access it fully.]
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gbr.newt.com 2.4.10-686 #1 Sat Sep 29 19:30:50 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.4-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.011006 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 154224-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 May 2003 19:00:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 12 14:00:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mars.mj.nl [81.91.1.49]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19FIX7-0001Yw-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 14:00:21 -0500
Received: (qmail 21968 invoked from network); 12 May 2003 19:00:16 -0000
Received: from 81-91-5-31-customer.mjdsl.nl (HELO thanatos.localdomain)
(81.91.5.31)
by www.mj.nl with SMTP; 12 May 2003 19:00:16 -0000
Received: from localhost (thanatos [127.0.0.1])
by thanatos.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id C892910DF30
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 May 2003 20:22:46 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Fixed in 0.5.5
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization:
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4
Date: 12 May 2003 20:22:46 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
There is a new apt_preferences file in apt 0.5.5.
The file still has problems. I am about to file a new
bug report about them. While we wait for the page to
be fixed, you can read the revised page at:
http://lists.debian.org/deity/2003/deity-200305/msg00009.html
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
