Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2003 10:35:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#193525: apt: must download entire packages file just to
make sure got the latest
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2003 07:33:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 02:33:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from nk210-200-180-161.cl.fx.apol.com.tw (.sina.com.tw)
[210.200.180.161]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19GZj3-0005Aa-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 02:33:57 -0500
Received: from jidanni.org (TC218-187-75-171.2-3.pl.apol.com.tw
[218.187.75.171])
by .sina.com.tw (8.12.2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4G7iAW8067123
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 16 May 2003 15:44:47 +0800 (CST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19GUt5-00011s-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 10:23:59 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: must download entire packages file just to make sure got the
latest
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 10:23:59 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/apt-get
For us offline modem users, is there a better way, when one wants the
ease of
# apt-get install some-tiny-package
but doesn't want the overhead of
# apt-get update
almost every day, just to make sure one is getting the latest
some-tiny-package.
So it occurred to me that instead of fetching e.g.
http://debian.linux.org.tw/debian/pool/main/l/linkchecker/linkchecker_1.8.12-1_i386.deb
why not fetch
http://debian.linux.org.tw/debian/pool/main/l/linkchecker/linkchecker_latest.deb
i.e. a symlink to the latest version on the server.
Indeed, my miracle idea could be phased in without disturbing the
present system, and */*_latest.deb's on the server wouldn't disturb anything.
For simple packages that just get newer, this seems like it will
work...
Oh, then one must rename the package after retrieval. Also maybe the
dependencies have changed....
Ok, well that was fun, never mind.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.20-k7 #1 Tue Jan 14 00:29:06 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-15 The GNU stdc++ library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 193525-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2003 08:35:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 16 03:35:52 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from slider.rack66.net [212.3.252.135] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19Gagy-0004uW-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 03:35:52 -0500
Received: by slider.rack66.net (Postfix, from userid 1026)
id 81E1AF249; Fri, 16 May 2003 10:35:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 10:35:50 +0200
From: Filip Van Raemdonck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#193525: apt: must download entire packages file just to make
sure got the latest
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-23.1 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:23:59AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
>
> http://debian.linux.org.tw/debian/pool/main/l/linkchecker/linkchecker_latest.deb
> i.e. a symlink to the latest version on the server.
<snip>
> Also maybe the dependencies have changed....
Exactly. You point out that it's impossible to do this, yet you do file
a bug.
> Ok, well that was fun, never mind.
Regards,
Filip
--
"Did you know that if you play a Windows 2000 cd backwards, you will hear the
voice of Satan?
That's nothing! If you play it forward, it'll install Windows 2000."
-- Robert Guthrie
