Hello,
The original bug report being so terse, I'm not sure my problem is the same
than the one of the original submitter, but I guess so. Or at least, it's
really related. Here is a sniplet of my problem:
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ sudo apt-get -d install libdb4.1-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
libdb2-dev
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libdb4.1-dev
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 163 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/5193kB of archives.
After unpacking 11.1MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Download complete and in download only mode
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ dpkg -l libdb{2,4.1}-dev
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
Description
+++-================================-================================-================================================================================
ii libdb2-dev 2.7.7.0-8 The
Berkeley database routines (development files).
pn libdb4.1-dev <none> (no
description available)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why should I say "Yes" to a question asking me if I want to remove my good
old libdb2-dev, if at the end, the package isn't desinstalled (which is
exactly what I want).
Keep the good work on !
Bye, Mt.
--
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
