Your message dated Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:50:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Doesn't make sense
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2003 05:49:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 14 23:49:34 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18jvCg-0005sL-00; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 23:49:34 -0600
Received: from tc210-203-46-188.3-17.pl.ebtnet.net ([210.203.46.188]
helo=jidanni.org)
by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
id 18jvCX-00016P-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 00:49:34 -0500
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18jqne-0003k9-00; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 09:07:26 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt: maybe have apt-cache show failed installation information
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 09:07:26 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=4.0
tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/apt-cache
dpkg says this package is not installed, but rather Failed-config
# dpkg -l noffle
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==================-==================-===============
iF noffle 1.1.4-1 offline news server
therefore, it might be nice if we were to see some clue that all was
not hunky dory here too:
# apt-cache policy noffle
noffle:
Installed: 1.1.4-1
Candidate: 1.1.4-1
Version Table:
*** 1.1.4-1 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.1.3-1 0
500 http://debian.linux.org.tw sid/main Packages
1.0.1-1 0
500 cdrom://[Debian GNU/Linux ...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-k7 #1 Sun Oct 6 20:29:56 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
Versions of packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-15 The GNU stdc++ library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 181073-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2003 12:50:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 25 07:50:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19g21T-0007cl-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 07:50:11 -0500
Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com
([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
id 19g21T-0006pI-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:50:11 -0400
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19g21P-0004t7-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:50:07 -0400
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 08:50:07 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Doesn't make sense
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
apt-cache policy is not supposed to show the status of an installed package.
apt-cache show does that.
--
- mdz
