On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 07:03:18PM +0200, Uwe Kappe wrote:
> On 26.Jul.2003 um 10:18:12AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 11:08:26AM +0200, Uwe Kappe wrote:
> > > for several weeks there is python-apt in my upgrade-list. Unfortunally
> > > the package is broken because there are two unsatisfied depencies:
> > > --- libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0 (UNSATISFIED)
> > > --- libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 (UNSATISFIED)
[..]
> > These are virtual packages provided by apt.
> So python-apt has a BUG (!) even it depends on packages that aren't
> available! It's not OK when you only close this ticket.
They are available:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ apt-cache showpkg libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0
Package: libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0
Versions:
Reverse Depends:
python-apt,libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0
python-apt,libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0
Dependencies:
Provides:
Reverse Provides:
apt-utils 0.5.8
Shows this one is provided by apt-utils.
If you apt-cache show apt-utils you'll see:
Package: apt-utils
[..]
Version: 0.5.8
Provides: libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0
for unstable for example.
Unstable's apt provides libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 which is the other you
complained about.
I think they've provided these new versions since 0.5.5 or so.
Certainly 0.5.5.1 provides them.
Simon.
--
oOoOo "If you need to find a good pub in London follow people oOoOo
oOoOo wearing Debian shirts. It works, it really does. " -- oOoOo
oOoOo Alan Cox oOoOo
