On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:18:53AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > FWIW, this seems to be close to happening now. I just got hit with it > on a freshly installed woody system with the following sources.list, > which is not very extravagant: > > deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main > deb-src http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main > deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ woody main > deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ woody main > deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main > deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US woody/non-US main > deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable main > deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable main > > The default cache is still barely large enough if the two "unstable" > lines are "testing" instead, but if packages propagate from unstable > to testing faster than others get dropped, things will get > interesting.
Your test uses the sum of woody+unstable. We only have a real problem if sarge (alone) is too large, which I do not think is even close to being true at this time. -- - mdz
