Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:36:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#198658: Why doesn't remove packages?]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2003 18:13:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 30 13:13:13 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from thangorodrim.info (ancalagon.thangorodrim.info) [217.160.110.51]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hvRm-0004pF-00; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:13:10 -0500
Received: from pd9e3f2a2.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.242.162] helo=freya.ydal.de)
by ancalagon.thangorodrim.info with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
id 19hvRl-0002WP-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:13:09 +0200
Received: from loki.ydal.de ([192.168.74.23] ident=mail)
by freya.ydal.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19hvRm-00035F-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:13:10 +0200
Received: from towo by loki.ydal.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19hvRj-0004oX-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:13:07 +0200
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:13:07 +0200
From: Tobias Wolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: python-apt: mixed-up dependencies leading to installation problems in
sarge
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.20
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Tobias Wolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-RBL-Warning: (relays.osirusoft.com)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.5.5.1
Severity: grave
Okay, look at the following:
python-apt (0.5.5.1), in sarge, depends on the following:
* libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0
* libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3
The packages providing the libapt-(inst|pkg) stuff are apt-utils and
apt, respectively.
Both of these packages are available as of version 0.5.4 in sarge.
BUT -- the package versions in sarge in question only provide:
apt-utils, 0.5.4 - libapt-inst-libc6.2-3-2-1.0=20
apt, 0.5.4 - libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2=20
Wheres the _sid_ versions, i.e. 0.5.8, provide:
apt-utils, 0.5.8 - libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3=20
apt, 0.5.8 - libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0=20
Seems like the sid dependencies got mixed into sarge, for whatever
reason.
This, of course, leads to the following nicety:
$ sudo apt-get install python-apt
[...]
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
python-apt: Depends: libapt-inst-libc6.3-5-1.0 but it is not installable
Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 but it is not installable
E: Sorry, broken packages
Et cetera, rendering packages like apt-listchanges unusable, too.
I'd advise someone to fix this.
-towo
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/KAqzOOnzljbgEa8RAqznAJ9PE/acwuZhCRDhld7FkJEKWqqa8QCdFKZb
peRhvMGqMZ1x9oM1CNdF5Ws=
=MGcI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 193566-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2003 15:36:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 17 10:36:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blacksheep.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.6]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AAWeA-0000cs-00; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:36:10 -0500
Received: from dijkstra (dijkstra.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.152])
by blacksheep.csh.rit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2382A2C8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:36:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mdz by dijkstra with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AAWe9-0001hH-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:36:09 -0400
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:36:09 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#198658: Why doesn't remove packages?]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.8 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
python-apt (and therefore apt-listchanges) are now now installable in
testing again.
----- Forwarded message from Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:00:55 -0500
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Uwe Storbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#198658: Why doesn't remove packages?
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:41:13PM +0200, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> BTW, how can a package get into testing with such basically unmet
> dependencies? This state keeps on for months ...
>
> # apt-get install apt-listchanges
> ...
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> apt-listchanges: Depends: python (>= 2.3) but 2.1.3-4 is to be installed
Actually, that state has changed over the last few months: it used to be
something else that caused apt-listchanges to be uninstallable. The
problem is that once a package is uninstallable in testing, which
apt-listchanges was due to a complicated "greatest good for the greatest
number" situation a while back, the scripts that manage testing are
completely willing to break more of its dependencies and make it worse,
so it can be quite difficult to get it back.
apt-listchanges is now installable in sarge, and whichever bugs are open
about that alone (not this one) can be closed now.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- End forwarded message -----
--
- mdz
