Your message dated Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:36:09 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#198658: Why doesn't remove packages?]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2003 21:19:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 02 16:19:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (serge.spb.cityline.ru) [194.67.5.2] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19Mwi9-0003cJ-00; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 16:19:21 -0500
Received: from serge by serge.spb.cityline.ru with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 19Mwhz-0003Gk-00; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 01:19:11 +0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Serge Matveev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apt-listchanges: Broken package in Testing Distribution
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 01:19:11 +0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: apt-listchanges
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-03
Severity: normal


Apt-listchanges: Depends: python-apt but it is not going to be installed

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux serge 2.4.20-1-686 #1 Sat Mar 22 13:16:21 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 193566-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2003 15:36:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 17 10:36:11 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blacksheep.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.6] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AAWeA-0000cs-00; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:36:10 -0500
Received: from dijkstra (dijkstra.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.152])
        by blacksheep.csh.rit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2382A2C8
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:36:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mdz by dijkstra with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1AAWe9-0001hH-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:36:09 -0400
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:36:09 -0400
From: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#198658: Why doesn't remove packages?]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.8 required=4.0
        tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE
        autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_17
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_17 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

python-apt (and therefore apt-listchanges) are now now installable in
testing again.

----- Forwarded message from Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:00:55 -0500
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Uwe Storbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#198658: Why doesn't remove packages?

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:41:13PM +0200, Uwe Storbeck wrote:
> BTW, how can a package get into testing with such basically unmet
> dependencies? This state keeps on for months ...
> 
> # apt-get install apt-listchanges
> ...
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
>   apt-listchanges: Depends: python (>= 2.3) but 2.1.3-4 is to be installed

Actually, that state has changed over the last few months: it used to be
something else that caused apt-listchanges to be uninstallable. The
problem is that once a package is uninstallable in testing, which
apt-listchanges was due to a complicated "greatest good for the greatest
number" situation a while back, the scripts that manage testing are
completely willing to break more of its dependencies and make it worse,
so it can be quite difficult to get it back.

apt-listchanges is now installable in sarge, and whichever bugs are open
about that alone (not this one) can be closed now.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
 - mdz

Reply via email to