On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 03:37:44PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 06:00:05PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Sun, 2003-12-28 at 17:11, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > > > Was the intention to move away from per-section Release files, and to only > > > use the top-level one? Or was this an oversight, and we should be > > > downloading these files and continuing to use them? > > > > I think our thought was that the per-section Release files should go > > away in favor the main Release file; they don't actually contain any > > more information, right? > > Correct, they do not contain any more information. The only feature that > would be lost is the ability to set different parameters (codename, > notautomatic, etc.) for the various sections of an archive. I don't think > that anyone is doing this, and it doesn't seem worth the extra complexity. > > One other small difference is that the main Release file uses "Suite" rather > than "Archive". I'm inclined to just change the code to look for Suite, > since it seems to match other terminology better.
Done in 0.6.4 (experimental). -- - mdz
