On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 01:43:13PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Ross Boylan wrote: > > > This is on a single-user system that was not connected to the internet > > (i.e., no mail) during the session. > > > > Despite the projected 2077kB to be used, /usr alone grew by about 3Mg, > > with a bit of growth in / and /var as well. > > New files were installed, and old files deleted, but some running program > still had the old files opened, so their space wasn't reclaimed. > That makes sense. And since the case with what I thought was the big discrepancy looks OK too, this is probably a false alarm.
It's OK with me if you close it, or you can leave it to see if anyone else notices a problem. Thanks.
