Your message dated Wed, 05 May 2004 21:05:53 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#247550: pgrep: package is misnamed: the binary is called
pcregrep
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2004 14:35:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 29 07:35:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.ispsnet.net [64.63.240.3]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJCdp-0006n9-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:35:58 -0700
Received: from hotpop.com (unverified [64.63.231.62])
by smtp3.ispsnet.net (Joe 1) with ESMTP id 12284967
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:19:38 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:36:38 +0200
From: Stephen Pinker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031107
Debian/1.5-3
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LOW Priority: ...apt/examples/configure-index.gz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.24
A small text correction in: /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz
quote:
Cache
{
Important "false";
AllVersions "false";
GivenOnly "false";
RecruseDepends "false";
};
Should be "RecurseDepends". Thank you.
Stephen Pinker
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 246550-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 20:05:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 05 13:05:59 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p4-7014.uk2net.com [213.232.95.15] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BLSeU-0000SF-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 13:05:59 -0700
Received: from cpc2-lock1-4-0-cust50.cos2.cable.ntl.com ([81.108.253.50]
helo=mnb.org.uk)
by p4-7014.uk2net.com with asmtp
(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_RIJNDAEL_128_CBC_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.20)
id 1BLSeP-0003uF-KN; Wed, 05 May 2004 21:05:53 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 21:05:53 +0100
From: Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Henry House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#247550: pgrep: package is misnamed: the binary is called
pcregrep
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.0 (built Fre Mai 2 17:54:00 CEST 2003)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Henry House wrote:
>I think that this packaged is poorly named. The binary is called
>pcregrep (and pgrep is another entirely unrelated program), so it would
>be better packaged as 'pcregrep'.
>
>
It is, in "sarge" (the current "unstable" version of debian, which will
become the next stable release some time, probably in the next few months).
