>>>>> "MZ" == Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MZ> On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 10:17:46AM +0100, Anders Boström wrote: >> sid:~# apt-cache policy autofs >> autofs: >> Installed: 4.1.3-5 >> Candidate: 4.1.3-5 >> Version Table: >> 4.1.3-6 0 >> 50 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org testing/main Packages >> 50 http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/main Packages >> 50 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org unstable/main Packages >> *** 4.1.3-5 0 >> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status >> [...] >> Why isn't autofs upgraded??? MZ> Because you told apt not to upgrade it. >> -- /etc/apt/preferences -- >> >> Package: * >> Pin: release a=unstable >> Pin-Priority: 50 MZ> 50 < 100 Yes, that's unstable, but the testing version is also 4.1.3-6. Why has that version also prio 50? If I perform the same command on i386, apt-cache policy autofs, is the testing version given a prio of 500. What is different? / Anders
