dalewolver wrote: > Anyone care to share their thoughts on madExcept vs Eurekalog.
Madshi, author of MadExcept, only plugs his product in response to relevant questions on the newsgroups. The maker of EurekaLog just sends unsolicited announcements, which leaves me with a bad impression. Madshi also posts responses to the newsgroups _without_ plugging his product; he strikes me a nice and helpful person, and I'd be happy to do business with him. You don't get the source code for EurekaLog unless you get the enterprise edition, which costs three times more than it would cost to get MadExcept. As a policy, I don't put anything into my programs that I don't have the source for. (It doesn't need to be "open source"; I just need to be able to recompile it or at least step through it with the debugger.) In addition to exceptions, MadExcept can detect hung programs. The only bad thing I have to say about MadExcept is that it costs more than I'm willing to pay for it. I would use it myself, but since what I usually need is just the basic stack-tracing and exception-handling capabilities, it's hard to pass up the JCL's free JclDebug. MadExcept's stack traces can be a little more accurate than JclDebug's. -- Rob ----------------------------------------------------- Home page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/delphi-en/ To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/delphi-en/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
