I think that was comparing DBISAM tables used as memory tables vs
kbmMemTable. In this case, DBISAM could be much better since it would be
reading from disk instead of having everything in memory.
At 11:32 28/06/2001 +1200, you wrote:
>Aaron
>
>Just a note on the kbmMemTable list they did a comp of DBISAM and
>kbmMemTable
>the outcome was that DBISAM had a much higher instance memory usage
>(something to watch
>for if you are doing a large number of tables)
>
>Neven
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2001 11:29
>Subject: [DUG]: Zero-Footprint Databases - Initial Decision Made DBISAM
>looks good
>
>
>Thank you very much to all that made suggestions.
>
>I have tested DBISAM for Delphi4 and am quite happy with it so far. I
>will continue
>to experiment but at present it looks quick enough and stable enough to
>handle
>what we need.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
