Of course its not an object! The idea was to show Ross how he
could store records where object types were required.
( eg. Listbox.Items.Objects[x] )
My apologies if I didn't make that clear. I wrote that code in about 2
mins at 12 in the night. ; )
regards,
NIRAV KAKU
On 7 Jul 01, at 11:30, Patrick Dunford wrote:
> It's still not an object. Records are traditional procedural structures.
> They don't have anything OO about them.
>
- From the Shreemat Bh�gwat G�ta -
'Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Zealand Delphi Users group - Delphi List - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.delphi.org.nz
To UnSub, send email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with body of "unsubscribe delphi"
- Re: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... NIRAV KAKU
- Re: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... Ross Levis
- Re: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStr... Reginald Ebenezer
- RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... James Low
- RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... Ben Taylor
- RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... James Low
- Re: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... Ross Levis
- RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... Patrick Dunford
- Re: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... NIRAV KAKU
- RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... Patrick Dunford
- RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... James Low
- RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... Dennis Chuah
- RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStr... Patrick Dunford
- Re: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... Ross Levis
- Re: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStringLi... Paul Lowman
- RE: Listbox items (Was: Re: [DUG]: array of TStr... Patrick Dunford
