I thought I mentioned it was the first item on the new
projects/components page of Delphi's startup page. I guess alternatively it
can be found via the Borland website and code central.
In any case why wouldn't you like it? It's clean and fast and does
everything you would expect of it, and if not you can always descend from
it. I ask questions like this because my experience is limited. For all I
know there could be a real good reason for using this type of implementation
over the one Borland provides under certain applications. But I can't see
it and I certainly wouldn't use it simply because it doesn't have to be
created and free'd! To tell you truth the one thing that has bothered me
more about NET than anything else is having to depend upon it's garbage
collection and sometimes even finding out if something's life has to be
handled implicitly or not. I imagine I'll get used to it, but not having
worked with Java or any other languages that support GC I do find it a
little unnerving.
from Robert Meek dba Tangentals Design
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rob Kennedy
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 10:06 PM
To: Borland's Delphi Discussion List
Subject: Re: StringList alternatives
Robert Meek wrote:
> Also, I checked out just this morning a project in which an
> alternative to the TStringList was offered.
Are you going to show it to us, or must we guess about where to find it?
> It's a very easy unit to
> understand and make use of but I'm just a little curious about why or when
> this would be of any real value?
If you don't like Borland's TStringList implementation, then I suppose
another one might have value.
--
Rob
_______________________________________________
Delphi mailing list -> [email protected]
http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/delphi
_______________________________________________
Delphi mailing list -> [email protected]
http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/delphi
