Can you post a short "demo" of what you're trying to accomplish, using
Pascal/Delphi syntax? I insist on pascal syntax (as opposed to pseudocode or
fortran) because I think you want something that can't be accomplished by a
compiled language without using some odd trick.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paule Ecimovic
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 1:24 AM
> To: Borland's Delphi Discussion List
> Subject: Re: A Delphi Component that enables namelist-directed I/O
> 
> Thanks Cosmin,
> 
>     Firstly, thank you for both your thorough response and your incisive
> sense of humor, which even helps digestion of the solutions you offer in
> ways that make them even more useful. Secondly, the ordering of your
> solutions from most encapsulated to most exposed build-your-own
> meta-language with a parser culminating in the very advice I am trying to
> avoid shows and evaluates for me a spectrum of ready solutions. This all
> makes me see how high performance oriented Fortran 9x really is and how
> expensive a trade-off are built in graphics, RAD GUI development (even the
> best in the programming industry), and a very familiar, quite complete,
> and
> powerful implementation of object-oriented programming for language
> features
> that are tuned to the decades old and still unchanging needs of scientific
> computing: high-volume, highly-structured data throughput in a
> computationally-intensive environment.
>     Plug-and-play reusability is, pardon the expression, a gimmick, which
> I
> have learning to sell myself on and have found very useful in not
> re-inventing the computer science wheel every time I need to do something
> that involves creating and parsing little variable-centric languages such
> as
> are instantly handled by Fortran 9x NAMELIST-directed I/O. I would like to
> used Delphi as a transparent
> Del-tran making the best use of the best parts of both languages. I
> realize
> that as the thread started by Robert Meek on the topic of deleting an
> element from an array brings home once again that the tax of encapsulating
> programming language dynamics in high-level facilities is paid at run-time
> in seemingly unaccountable ways. For plug-and-play re-usability of modern
> computer science routines to be feasible, it must become such that the
> solutions it encapsulates perform to between 60% and 80% of optimal
> runtime
> efficiency, i.e., the best hand-coding possible, in any conceivable
> context
> of application . I guess the over-head debate almost as old as Simula 67
> or
> at least as old as C++, but I'm sure the promise of OO and of Delphi's OO
> successor, component orientation, can and will be realize in high run-time
> performance, plug-and-play re-usable components that are mini-applications
> in themselves that needn't be re-coded (almost) at all: functionality
> pills
> to boost the potency of modern applications.
>     Specifically, I envision the system to work according to (excuse the
> schematic and informal syntax):
> 
> namelist_type_inst.write(varname,[var_type],varfile,[permissions]);
> 
> and
> 
> namelist_type_inst.write(varname,[var_type],varfile,[permissions]);
> 
> 
> This way I have an instance of a NAMELIST class which encapsulates write
> and
> read methods. The read method should read from a delimited plain text
> file,
> tokenize it, and parse it for regular expressions defined by the
> variable(s)
> and their types given as parameters. If there is a way to infer a
> variable's
> type from its instance properties, then the additional type parameter is
> unnecessary. If however, this problem turns out to be recursively
> unsolvable, then additional type information must be included as a
> parameter
> to the read method.
> 
> I could say more and I should provide an example, but that's for another
> note.
> 
> Paule
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cosmin Prund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Borland's Delphi Discussion List'" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 4:16 PM
> Subject: RE: A Delphi Component that enables namelist-directed I/O
> 
> 
> > Delphi has a VERY re-usable, plug-and-play solution for handling
> > object-to-text and text-to-object conversions. It's named "Delphi
> > Streaming
> > System" and it's the thing that produces the DFM's; And you will not
> like
> > it
> > - it's not really human readable.
> >
> > Also there's Delphi's TStringList. It has a "Values" property that can
> be
> > used to handle basic "key=value" pairs. Not very smart but can do the
> job.
> >
> > If TStringList's basic "key=value" is not enough you may consider
> > TIniFile.
> > TIniFiles offers a bit more, specifically it offeres a way to read a
> > "value"
> > as a given native type. It also has support for grouping values into
> > "sections".
> >
> > If you need more structure there's XML. It is text, it is cool and it is
> > almost human readable.
> >
> > If you don't want DFM, you don't want TStringList, you don't like good-
> old
> > TIniFile and you think XML is overkill, you can always roll your own :-)
> >
> > How exactly do you envision this plug-and-play system to work?
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> >> Behalf Of Paule Ecimovic
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:57 AM
> >> To: Borland's Delphi Discussion List
> >> Subject: A Delphi Component that enables namelist-directed I/O
> >>
> >> Hi, All
> >>
> >>     After coming across very useful threads in this list on writing to
> >> and
> >> reading from human-readable text files in structured ways, such as
> >> writing
> >> the values of a list of variables of various types to a file containing
> a
> >> string representing a given variable's name followed by a delimiter
> >> followed by that variable's value along with the ability to extract the
> >> information back from the corresponding file, I came to wondering
> whether
> >> there is a Delphi component that does this. In the past when I have
> >> posted
> >> to this list about this I got very useful pointers outside of Delphi,
> >> i.e., a wrapper of a C routine for NAMELIST-like functionality, or the
> >> tried and true yet insufficiently re-useable maxim "For best results,
> >> advice roll-your-own". I am wondering about a plug-and-play standard
> >> Delphi solution to this problem that I can re-use at the drop of a hat,
> >> everywhere.
> >>
> >> Many thanks in advance,
> >>
> >>     Paule
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Delphi mailing list -> [email protected]
> >> http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/delphi
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Delphi mailing list -> [email protected]
> > http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/delphi
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Delphi mailing list -> [email protected]
> http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/delphi

_______________________________________________
Delphi mailing list -> [email protected]
http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/delphi

Reply via email to