Hi Jolyon, Sorry for the confusion.
I mean add each operand of the assembler code corresponding to certain value of cpu cycles together to get a rough idea. Div is far more dear than plus for sure :-) Of course take care of condition jump/jump as this will multiple the figures depends on how many jump it will be. Regards Leigh On 18 August 2014 09:11, Jolyon Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Leigh, I'm not sure that this would be a reliable indicator of > performance. Surely some opcodes are more "expensive" than others ? The > relationship between opcodes and CPU cycles is not 1:1 afaik. > > > On 18 August 2014 08:51, Leigh Wanstead <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just one suggestion, why not look at assembler code in delphi to count >> the lines and add up the operands to get the cpu cycle total number? :-) >> >> My 2 nz cents >> >> Leigh >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list >> Post: [email protected] >> Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi >> Unsubscribe: send an email to [email protected] with >> Subject: unsubscribe >> > > > _______________________________________________ > NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list > Post: [email protected] > Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi > Unsubscribe: send an email to [email protected] with > Subject: unsubscribe >
_______________________________________________ NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list Post: [email protected] Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi Unsubscribe: send an email to [email protected] with Subject: unsubscribe
