I bought D2005 and it never made it out of the packaging after I worked on a contract using it. Painful.
Delphi 2006 is beautiful so far. I'm really happy with it, although I have not done any .Net debugging in it so far. I would really like to hear from people who are using it with .Net and how stable it is as that was where Delphi 2005 fell down. In particular the debuging / tracing aspect. Regards, Matt. > I understood D2005 was better than D8. D8 traumatised people. > > Richard > Enjoying getting back into Delphi... > --- > Richard Vowles, Solutions Architect, Borland New Zealand > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > phone: +64-9-9184573 > cell: +64-21-467747 > other: MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED], skype: rvowles > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Peter Ingham > Sent: Wednesday, 15 March 2006 7:23 p.m. > To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List > Subject: Re: [DUG] Re: List Working? > > Phil Middlemiss wrote: >> Well, >> >> at least we know now that the list is far from dead. And we have a >> fairly good idea of the kinds of things people are doing too. I was >> quite surprised by the slow uptake of D2006! I suspect that many >> people who didn't list it as a tool they are using are, like me, >> owners of it but just waiting for the opportunity to crack the thing >> open and actually move some projects across. > > If you are a Win32 App developer, then from what I have seen, D2006 is > worth the move. > > Slow uptake is probably related to Delphi 8 offering Win32 Developers > nothing other than possibilities, and D2005 being a retrograde step > (memory & CPU hungry, slow and less stable - even after 3 rounds of > patches). > > _______________________________________________ > Delphi mailing list > [email protected] > http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi > _______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
