|
Fair enough. I still want to keep the TCP/IP though, so I will wrap
that up in component and put a COM interface on it. Phil. Alan Rose wrote: When it comes to SDK's and I've played with a few they are have all used a COM interface. Probably your safest bet for attracting a large user base. Most programmers will be familiar with it.-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Phil Middlemiss Sent: Friday, 26 May 2006 1:43 p.m. To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List Subject: Re: [DUG] Advice on the TUMONZ SDK please Replying to your own post is bad form I know, but no one has bitten, so let me ask a simpler question: Having bought Delphi 2006 Pro (BDS2006, whatever) but not used it yet, can anyone tell me if there is a better (as in just as easy to use but not reliant on COM) technology than ActiveX automation objects that is not in Delphi 6 that I should consider using instead? Cheers, Phil._______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi |
begin:vcard fn:Phil Middlemiss n:Middlemiss;Phil org:Vision Software, MTS Ltd email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Project Leader tel;work:+64 7 3480001 tel;cell:+64 27 4592648 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.tumonz.co.nz version:2.1 end:vcard
_______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
