|
I have a lot of monolithic procedures and functions - so large that
they are just scary. yes this is bad, yes I'm refactoring them (as in
Martin Fowler's book - which is great by the way) - but I'm digressing
somewhat from the original question. So my answer is no there is not a 1:1 relationship in my code. >From my current readings on OO design and implementation small methods (with meaningful names) are they way to go, and is something that I will work towards (over the next few years), but even so there will not in general be a 1:1 correspondence of methods to try finally blocks. I hope this reply is not to rambling - am listening to the latest delphi hour while typing and multitasking is not my strong point (I think it's a guy thing in general) Alister Christie Computers for People Ph: 04 471 1849 Fax: 04 471 1266 http://www.salespartner.co.nz PO Box 13085 Johnsonville Wellington Conor Boyd wrote: I'm getting the impression here that a lot of people only have a 1:1 relationship between try.finallys and procedures/functions?Sounds a bit dangerous. Should realistically be a try..finally for each object you instantiate in a method. Comments, anyone? C. _______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi |
_______________________________________________ Delphi mailing list [email protected] http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
