Hey Tong,

Tomorrow morning i gonna fix those problems, the ones that still in bug state. 
I gonna give back here on ml asap with the status.

Cheers,
Francesco

Sent from my iPad

On 07/set/2011, at 23:09, Tong Li <liton...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Tried DC RC 4 with ruby 1.9.1 and latest dependencies and found quite few 
> problems.
> 
> The RC4 was downloaded here and seemed it was posted on 8/24. 
> http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.4.0/rc4/
> 
> 1. This should be just a bug.
> views/instances/show.html.haml has errors, it should have never worked.
> 
> both line 31 and 34 has code like this.
> 
> %p{ :'data-role' => 'fieldcontain'}=@instance.public_addresses.map.join(',')
> 
> the map.join should not have worked.
> 
> it needs to be changed to 
> 
> %p{ :'data-role' => 'fieldcontain'}=@instance.public_addresses.join(',')
> 
> 2. incorrectly use "lib" in the require path, this causes big problem for 
> others to use DC gem. There are two places
> 
> base_driver/base_driver.rb
> sinatra/rack_syslog.rb
> 
> both files have some thing like this
> 
> require 'lib/xxxxx'
> 
> They should be changed to 
> 
> require 'xxxxx'
> 3. In base_driver/features.rb, it still uses ordinalize method from an 
> integer, which has been removed in newer active_support package, 
> 4. i18n is a dependency , but was not stated in the spec. 
> 5. nokogiri requires some other dependency which is not available on 64 bits 
> platform, forgot the name of it, when I tried to gem install, it did a local 
> build, then blows up because it was trying to use 32 libraries on windows.
> 6. syslog is not available on windows platform, both item 5 and 6 really 
> hurts. I had to setup an Ubuntu 11.04 machine to do my development.
> 7. new RC4 is extremely slow. I run 0.4.0 and 0.3.0 on the same machine, 
> 0.4.0 took a lot longer from user point view. not sure if it has anything to 
> do with the newer UI or because of the thin server which is now required. Any 
> reason why switch it from WEBrick?
> 
> is there any way these problems can be fixed? or they have been fixed in 
> newer builds? If I can access the source, I do not mind to fix them. I think 
> that problems described in 1 to 4 should really be fixed ASAP.
> 
> Thanks.       
> 
> Tong Li
> Emerging Technologies & Standards
> B062/K317
> liton...@us.ibm.com
> 
> David Lutterkort ---09/06/2011 07:17:45 PM---On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 15:40 
> -0400, Tong Li wrote: > finally had time to try this rc4, however, syslo
> 
> From: David Lutterkort <lut...@redhat.com>
> To:   deltacloud-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: 09/06/2011 07:17 PM
> Subject:      Re: syslog in DeltaCloud 0.4.0
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 15:40 -0400, Tong Li wrote:
> > finally had time to try this rc4, however, syslog is now needed by few
> > files in DC.  unfortunately syslog is not available on windows platform, so
> > somehow this release becomes platform specific. is this really intended? am
> > I missing something?
> 
> No, the intent is not to make it platform specific - we need to figure
> out how to replace syslog on Windows. Should probably fall back to
> writing to stdout. Or do you know of a more elegant fallback ?
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to