On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 09:02 -0500, Doug Davis wrote: > I think its safe to assume that when the xsd for the cimi spec is written > it'll be written such that the xml elements will be required to be in the > order specified by the xsd.
Yeah, I wasn't expecting otherwise. Shouldn't be a huge issue to take care of. BTW, I _think_ we'll have enough metadata in the Ruby code to generate rng (or maybe even xsd) if that should be useful. David
